New tool: virt-ls

Want to list out the files in your virtual machine? Step forward virt-ls:

# virt-ls CentOS5x32 /
# virt-ls -R CentOS5x32 /etc/httpd

See also: virt-cat, guestfish.

Do you want to suggest an addition to the virt-* tools family? Please comment here or let me know.


Filed under Uncategorized

7 responses to “New tool: virt-ls

  1. Not sure if it’s in already, but how about status monitoring from outside the guest? service status, /proc foo?

  2. rich

    Jeroen, thanks for commenting.

    General monitoring of guests is something we’ve been thinking long and hard about, and part of that is available with virt-top and with the underlying libvirt APIs which I implemented like virDomainBlockStats and virDomainInterfaceStats. virt-df is also worth mentioning.

    A lot of people ask me if we can use (eg.) virt-cat to look at /proc of a guest, but that’s not possible because /proc is a generated filesystem. However we want to implement process lists (virt-ps) and other stats monitoring through the virt-tools project, which uses a small SNMP agent inside the guest and is compatible with Windows guests too. You can grab that code now if you want to play with it or make contributions.

    • Hi Richard,

      thanks for your answer. It gives me a little more insight on how these tools work, I think. Assuming I’m right with what I’m thinking right now, noted I’m often not, would the ultimate way forward not be a channel much like a host kernel enabled communication interface with the guest?

      I’m saying this without regard to any Microsoft product that would need to be supported as well; obviously challenges are greater there, and quite frankly I think they just lose.

      Either way, what are your thoughts on letting the host (directed by “management” maybe?) monitor the guest(s) for both system & service performance & availability? Possibly even configuration management could be applied through the host? One could centralize a lot more, reduce footprints (in/on the guest) and possibly account for much more resources much more efficiently given accounting features in the manager.

      The longer I’m thinking about this, the more I think this isn’t a topic to discuss in a blog post. Are you going to be in Toronto by any chance? πŸ˜‰

      • rich

        Yes, it would be nice. This is loosely what we might call the “vmchannel problem”. “vmchannel” is the feature we’d all like — a general, non-network specific communications channel between host and guest — but no one can agree what it should look like or implement something that everyone wants.

        If we had such a thing obviously monitoring and management would be much easier. But we don’t.

        About reducing footprints — take a look at KSM.

        Sorry, I won’t be in Toronto in the foreseeable future πŸ™‚

  3. someone

    How does one get this virt goodness on Debian, Ubuntu, OpenSUSE or Slackware?

  4. rich

    See the FAQ. There is a package for Debian already, and that probably works on Ubuntu. We’re looking for people to help package for the other distributions, so join the mailing list if you want to help out.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.